Category: Court of Protection

Welford Solicitors and Legal Aid: Getting Court of Protection Help at No Cost

Posted on by admin

When someone can’t make certain decisions for themselves about their care, treatment or finances the Court of Protection is there to ensure those decisions are made lawfully and fairly.

But for many families, the first concern isn’t the law itself — it’s the cost.

How can you get help if you can’t afford a solicitor?

That’s where legal aid comes in.

It’s a public funding system that makes legal representation accessible to everyone, not just those who can pay for it. In many Court of Protection cases, that means help is completely free.

What the Court of Protection Does

The Court of Protection was established under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 to protect individuals who lack capacity to make specific decisions.

It deals with three main types of cases:

  • Health and welfare – deciding where someone should live or what care they receive.
  • Medical treatment – authorising or refusing treatment when capacity or consent is unclear.
  • Property and finance – appointing deputies to manage money or assets.

Every decision the Court makes must be in the person’s best interests and in line with their legal rights.

These are sensitive, often emotional cases. Having a solicitor who understands the process and knowing that funding is available can make everything more manageable.

Why Legal Aid Exists

Legal aid is a cornerstone of the justice system.

It ensures that people who cannot afford legal help are still able to access it when their rights, liberty or welfare are at stake.

In the context of the Court of Protection, legal aid guarantees that the most vulnerable — those who can’t speak or act for themselves — still have representation.

It’s not a benefit or a favour; it’s a legal right.

If your case qualifies, the government pays your solicitor directly through the Legal Aid Agency.

When Legal Aid Covers Court of Protection Cases

Legal aid isn’t one-size-fits-all. Whether it’s automatic or means-tested depends on what the case involves.

1. Welfare and Liberty Cases — Non-Means-Tested

If the case concerns a person’s welfare or liberty, funding is almost always non-means-tested.

This means there’s no financial assessment — eligibility is automatic.

Examples include:

  • Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) cases,
  • Section 21A challenges under the Mental Capacity Act,
  • Serious medical treatment cases
  • Disputes about care or living arrangements that restrict freedom.

In these situations, the person at the centre of the case called “P” automatically qualifies for legal aid.

The court may appoint the Official Solicitor or another representative to act on P’s behalf, ensuring their views are presented clearly and independently.

2. Property or Financial Cases — Means-Tested

When the issue relates to managing money or property, legal aid can still apply but is means-tested.

The Legal Aid Agency reviews income, savings and assets to decide if the applicant qualifies.

If approved, it can cover all or part of the legal costs.

While financial cases are assessed differently, the aim remains the same  making sure access to justice isn’t denied because of cost.

What Legal Aid Covers

Legal aid isn’t just about paying for a court hearing. It covers the entire legal process, including:

  • Early advice from your solicitor,
  • Preparing and filing the application,
  • Gathering medical or capacity evidence,
  • Communicating with professionals and relatives
  • Representation in court hearings.

If the matter is urgent for instance, where medical treatment can’t wait, emergency legal aid can be approved within hours.

Your solicitor handles the paperwork directly with the Legal Aid Agency, so you can focus on the case, not the forms.

Why It Matters

Without legal aid, many people would be left unrepresented in cases that directly affect their wellbeing and freedom.

It ensures that:

  • Everyone’s rights are respected, regardless of income.
  • Public authorities remain accountable for decisions affecting vulnerable people.
  • Families have support navigating the process.

Legal aid doesn’t just fund legal advice — it keeps the entire system fair.

What Happens When Legal Aid Is Granted

Once legal aid is approved, the solicitor represents you or your loved one throughout the process.

The funding covers the cost of legal advice, representation and any expert assessments needed to support the case.

If the person at the centre of the case lacks capacity, legal aid ensures their voice is still heard often through an independent advocate or the Official Solicitor.

It means the case is decided on evidence and law, not on who can afford to attend court.

How Welford Solicitors Help

At Welford Solicitors, we specialise in Court of Protection and mental capacity law.

Our solicitors work with families, professionals and advocates to ensure every case is handled lawfully, sensitively and with care.

Here’s how we help clients access legal aid:

Checking eligibility

We quickly assess whether your case is non-means-tested or means-tested and apply for funding on your behalf.

Applying for emergency funding

If a decision is urgent such as an emergency order for serious medical treatment we can secure funding immediately so the case can proceed without delay.

Representing you in court

We present the case clearly and ensure that all evidence, medical reports and legal arguments are properly prepared and understood.

Keeping it personal

We know these cases are about people, not paperwork. Every step is explained in plain English, so you understand what’s happening and why.

Access to Justice, Not Cost

When it comes to care, liberty or medical treatment, no one should hesitate to seek legal help because of money.

Legal aid makes sure that doesn’t happen.

If the case is about welfare or freedom, the funding is automatic.

If it’s about property or finances, the means test ensures support is still available where it’s genuinely needed.

The goal is simple: to make the justice system fair for everyone, not just the few.

What Is The Care Act 2014?

Posted on by admin

The Care Act 2014 changed how adult social care works in England.

It brought together decades of confusing laws into one clear system designed to protect people who need care and support and the carers who look after them.

It’s a law built on three ideas: dignity, choice and fairness.

It defines how local authorities must assess, plan and fund care for adults and how they should work with the NHS, families and social workers to meet people’s needs.

Understanding it matters because the Care Act doesn’t just shape care services; it also affects legal decisions made in the Court of Protection, especially for those who lack mental capacity.

Why the Care Act Exists

Before 2014, adult social care law was messy and inconsistent.

Different councils followed different rules. People often didn’t know what support they were entitled to or how to challenge poor decisions.

The Care Act replaced that with one national framework. It made local authorities legally responsible for promoting wellbeing and protecting vulnerable adults not as an option but as a duty.

It also gave carers new rights and put prevention at the heart of social care. The idea was simple: help people stay independent for as long as possible and make sure care decisions are fair, lawful and transparent.

What the Law Covers

The Act applies to adults aged 18 or over who need care or support because of illness, disability or frailty.

It also protects carers who provide unpaid support to friends or relatives.

Under the Act, local authorities must:

  • Assess needs – regardless of finances or diagnosis.
  • Decide eligibility – using a national threshold so the system is consistent.
  • Plan and fund care – in partnership with the person and their family.
  • Review regularly – to ensure care remains suitable.

These duties are legally enforceable. If an assessment or decision is mishandled, it can be challenged sometimes through the Court of Protection or judicial review.

The Focus on Wellbeing

One of the most important parts of the Care Act is its definition of wellbeing.
It’s not just about safety or physical health. It includes:

  • Mental and emotional health,
  • Control over daily life,
  • Relationships and social connections,
  • Dignity, independence and choice.

This wellbeing principle must guide every care decision. It’s what local authorities, care providers and courts use to judge whether a plan is fair and proportionate.

How It Links to the Mental Capacity Act 2005

The Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Care Act 2014 often work side by side.

The Mental Capacity Act sets the rules for making decisions when a person can’t do so themselves for example, because of dementia, brain injury or mental illness.

The Care Act then ensures those decisions turn into real-world support.

If professionals or family members disagree about what’s best for a person who lacks capacity, the case can be referred to the Court of Protection.

The court decides what’s lawful and in the person’s best interests guided by both Acts.

The Role of the Court of Protection

The Court of Protection oversees decisions for people who cannot make them independently.

In care cases, that often means deciding:

  • Where someone should live,
  • What care they should receive,
  • Who they have contact with
  • Whether restrictions on their liberty are justified.

The Care Act’s emphasis on wellbeing and fairness often shapes how these cases are judged.

The court ensures care decisions are not only medically sound but also lawful and respectful of personal rights.

When care arrangements limit someone’s freedom for example, constant supervision or being unable to leave a care home the court may review whether this amounts to a deprivation of liberty and if it needs authorisation.

Serious Medical Treatment and the Care Act

Some of the most complex cases arise when doctors and families disagree about serious medical treatment — surgery, life support or withdrawal of care.

If the person lacks capacity, these decisions go to the Court of Protection.

While the Mental Capacity Act governs decision-making, the Care Act ensures the person’s wider welfare is still considered including support for carers, advocacy and post-treatment care planning.

This joined-up approach means that social care and medical care are treated as part of the same legal framework, not separate systems.

The Responsibilities of Local Authorities

Under the Care Act, councils have specific, ongoing obligations. They must:

  • Provide clear information about services,
  • Offer assessments to anyone who may need care,
  • Involve people in decisions about their support and
  • Protect individuals from abuse or neglect.

They must also coordinate with NHS and mental health professionals, ensuring that no one falls through the gaps between social care and healthcare.

When councils fail to meet these duties, families can challenge decisions through formal complaints, the Local Government Ombudsman or, in serious cases, legal action.

The Role of Mental Health Solicitors

Mental health solicitors often become involved when care, treatment and liberty overlap.

They represent clients in cases involving:

  • Disputes over care plans or placements,
  • Applications to the Court of Protection and
  • Complex decisions about medical treatment or capacity.

They also support families through processes like a court application for serious medical treatment, ensuring that decisions respect the law and the person’s best interests.

In many cases, legal aid is available especially where a person’s liberty or capacity is in question.

Why the Care Act Still Matters

A decade after it came into force, the Care Act 2014 continues to define how England approaches adult care.

It’s not just about funding or assessments. It’s about rights — the right to dignity, safety and autonomy even when support is needed.

It ensures that local authorities remain accountable, that carers receive recognition and that the system treats people as individuals, not cases.

When combined with the Mental Capacity Act and the oversight of the Court of Protection, it forms a complete framework — one that protects some of the most vulnerable people in society.

When Legal Help Is Needed

Understanding the Care Act is one thing; applying it can be another.

Disputes over funding, assessments or capacity decisions can escalate quickly.

That’s where early advice helps.

Welford Solicitors specialises in Court of Protection, mental capacity and healthcare law, including cases that involve the Care Act 2014 and serious medical treatment applications.

Our solicitors guide families, professionals and advocates through the process with clarity — ensuring decisions are lawful, fair and focused on the person’s wellbeing.

How Do I Choose the Right Court of Protection Solicitors for My Situation?

Posted on by admin

When someone close to you loses the ability to make certain decisions for themselves, life changes quickly. You may find yourself trying to manage their care, sort their finances or work out what’s best – all while facing unfamiliar legal processes.

The Court of Protection exists to protect people who cannot make specific decisions because they lack mental capacity. But understanding how it works and how to navigate it properly, can be difficult without guidance.

That’s where the right solicitor comes in. Choosing someone who truly understands this area of law can make the process far clearer and far less stressful.

What the Court of Protection Does

The Court of Protection is a specialist court that makes decisions for people who lack the mental capacity to make them for themselves. 

A person might lack capacity due to dementia, a learning disability, brain injury or a mental health condition. In these cases, the court can step in to protect their best interests.

The court can:

  • Appoint a deputy to make ongoing decisions about care or finances.
  • Decide what medical treatment is in someone’s best interests.
  • Decide where someone should live and who they should have contact with
  • Resolve disagreements between families, doctors or local authorities.
  • Authorise situations where someone’s freedom is restricted for safety reasons (known as a deprivation of liberty).

Every decision must follow one key principle: it must be made in the person’s best interests.

Why the Right Solicitor Matters

Court of Protection work is not general legal work. It sits at the intersection of law, health and care often involving sensitive decisions about vulnerable people.

An experienced solicitor helps you navigate that complexity. They manage applications, prepare documents and communicate with professionals on your behalf. More importantly, they make sure that the person’s rights are protected at every stage.

These cases often involve emotion as well as law. A good solicitor understands both, guiding you calmly through what can be an overwhelming process.

Look for Genuine Expertise

The first step is to find a solicitor who genuinely specialises in Court of Protection and Mental Capacity law.

Specialist solicitors may hold Law Society accreditations in this area. The two most relevant are:

  1. Mental Capacity (Welfare) Accreditation – for solicitors who represent clients in welfare and capacity cases.
  2. Mental Health Accreditation – for those who handle cases under the Mental Health Act or connected issues.

These accreditations show that a solicitor has been independently assessed for their experience, knowledge and professional standards.

At Welford Solicitors, members of our team hold these accreditations. We represent clients across a wide range of health and welfare capacity matters with a focus on clarity and fairness.

What to Ask Before You Decide

When speaking to a solicitor, the way they explain things often tells you as much as their credentials.

Here are useful questions to ask:

  • How often do you handle Court of Protection cases?
  • Are you accredited by the Law Society for Mental Capacity or Mental Health law?
  • What type of cases do you usually deal with?
  • Who will be managing my case?
  • What are your estimated costs and timescales?
  • Can you explain how Legal Aid works and whether I might qualify?

A professional solicitor will answer these questions clearly and honestly. You should come away from the conversation feeling informed, not pressured.

Communication Matters

Court of Protection cases can be detailed and emotional. The solicitor you choose should make you feel supported and understood, not confused by legal jargon.

Look for someone who:

  • Listen carefully to your situation before giving advice.
  • Explains processes in plain English, not legal shorthand.
  • Keeps you updated at every stage.
  • Treats every case individually, understanding that no two families are the same.

The best solicitors combine technical skill with patience and professionalism. They make sure you feel confident about what’s happening and why.

Be Clear on Costs and Funding

Court of Protection work can be funded in several ways.

  • Legal Aid is available for certain welfare matters, such as disputes about care or deprivation of liberty.
  • Non-means tested Legal Aid is provided for individuals who lack capacity in certain welfare cases.
  • Means-tested Legal Aid may be available to family members involved in some welfare applications, as well as for property and financial affairs matters.
  • If you’re paying privately, your solicitor should provide a clear written estimate before any work begins.

Transparency is key. You should always understand what you’re paying for and what the process involves before proceeding.

The Value of Local Knowledge

Although the Court of Protection operates nationally, most cases involve local professionals – NHS trusts, care providers and social services.

Based in Leicester, Welford Solicitors works closely with local courts, hospitals and councils across the Midlands and beyond, ensuring that each case runs efficiently and with care.

What a Good Solicitor Looks Like

A capable Court of Protection solicitor is not just technically skilled – they’re calm, clear and human.

They don’t rush. They don’t make unrealistic promises. They give you the confidence to make informed decisions, even when the subject is difficult.

Above all, they keep the focus where it belongs: on the person at the heart of the case.

Getting the Right Support When It Matters

When you’re dealing with the Court of Protection, it’s easy to feel out of your depth. The right solicitor helps you regain clarity.

Take your time to find someone you trust, someone who understands both the legal process and the human side of it. When those qualities come together, the journey becomes far less daunting.

Need Guidance with a Court of Protection Case?

At Welford Solicitors, we specialise in Court of Protection and Mental Capacity law. Our accredited team supports families, carers and professionals with straightforward, practical advice.

Obtaining Capacity Evidence & the Court of Protection

Posted on by admin

The key principle of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) is the presumption of capacity, which is one’s ability to make a decision. In certain circumstances, although someone may be deemed to lack capacity in specific domains, the parties involved may seek to obtain further capacity evidence. This evidence can be obtained by way of a section 49 report (MCA 2005) or, alternatively, by instructing an independent expert, who would have particular expertise to deal with P’s presentation or diagnosis. For example, if P was alcohol dependent then the parties would look to instruct an expert who specialised in dealing with such cases.  

Section 49 of the MCA 2005 allows the court to order a public body (e.g., NHS trust) to nominate an individual to provide a report at no cost. The details of what is being asked, and in this case, what capacity evidence is being sought, will be provided to the individual conducting the assessment in a Letter of Guidance.

If the parties are seeking to instruct an independent expert, they are to provide a letter of instruction which should identify what decisions are being considered, what information is considered relevant to the decisions, the two stage test (s2(1) and s3(1) MCA 2005), and the causative nexus. The instructions provided and the report produced must abide the fundamental principles of the MCA 2005 and the practice direction 15A in the Court of Protection Rules (COPR).

Practice Direction 15A – Expert Evidence

1. Part 15 is intended to limit the use of expert evidence to that which is necessary to assist the court to resolve the issues in the proceedings. After an application form is issued, no person may file expert evidence unless the court or a practice direction permits.

The entirety of Practice Direction 15A – Expert Evidence can be found here.

The case of AMDC v AG [2020] EWCOP 58 provides guidance for cases involving independent experts who has been instructed in assessing the protected party’s capacity. The Court provided guidance on how expert reports in respect of capacity are to be prepared so that is able to better assist the Court. The court determined that whilst an expert report is not a clinical assessment, it can assist the court in determining the identified issues in the matter of capacity.

When a report is provided, either by a public body or an expert, it is imperative that the basis of their opinion is thoroughly explained. If the protected party did not engage with the individual completing the assessment, all attempts made to engage them must be recorded in the report, alongside any alternative methods used to encourage engagement. If no steps are taken in respect of engaging the protected party to engage with the expert / public body, this would go against the fundamental principles of the MCA 2005.  In essence, when parties are seeking capacity evidence, the fundamental principles of the MCA 2005 must always be followed.

https://www.welfordsolicitors.co.uk/profiles/poonam-dadhania

Capacity surrounding issues around contraception.

Posted on by admin

In the case of A Local Authority v Mrs A and Mr A[2010] EWHC 1549 (Fam), Mr Justice Bodey rejected the LA’s submission that capacity to decide on contraception includes awareness of what is actually involved in caring for, and committing to a child. It was held that this set the bar too high and the test for capacity should relate only to the woman’s ability to understand and weigh up the immediate medical issues surrounding contraceptive treatment.

In EE (Capacity: Contraception and Conception) Re [2024] EWCOP 5, Mr Justice Poole agreed with the need to not set the bar too high, stating:

‘There are reasons to avoid setting the bar too high for capacity to make decisions about the use of contraception…Daily, in GP surgeries and clinics, women make decisions about contraception without considering the risks to them or to the health of their baby if they were to get pregnant. The risk of becoming pregnant following intercourse is a core piece of relevant information, but not all the many and varied risks which may be consequent on becoming pregnant. Some may envisage all manner of risks, others will not do so”.

The court emphasised the importance of not infringing on EE’s autonomy and rights to make decisions about her body and reproductive health.

https://www.welfordsolicitors.co.uk/profiles/raveena-bhoot

Court of Protection Proceedings – Participation of P

Posted on by admin

An individual who is alleged to lack the mental capacity to make decisions in respect of their health, welfare and/or the deprivation of their liberty under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (“MCA”), is referred to as a ‘Protected Party’, though more commonly in Court of Protection proceedings, ‘P’.  

Supporting P’s participation in Court of Protection proceedings is a fundamental aspect of  enabling the court to make a best interest decision in respect of P’s health and welfare, whether it be in relation to, where P resides and receives care; who they engage in relations with, for example, sexual relations, and the extent to which; who they have contact with or, any other matter affecting their health and welfare. Within the guidance handed down by Mr Justice Charles, the term ‘participation’ is given a broad meaning, though it is predominantly concerned with submitting evidence or information to the court, as part of the judicial process, and crucially, with supporting the involvement and understanding of the individual, in particular, P, in the process and its outcome.  

Further within his guidance, Mr Justice Charles suggests that the ‘key’ to P’s effective participation will begin with what is necessary for their effective participation within the court process, which concerns their best interests in respect of the conduct of the litigation. In order for P to be placed at the centre of the proceedings, Mr Justice Charles emphasises the importance of ascertaining P’s wishes and feelings in relation to the issues to be determined by the court. Ascertaining the wishes and feelings of P can, however, be an extremely challenging aspect of these proceedings. In some cases, P’s impairments may be sufficiently severe that they are unable to participate in any meaningful fashion in the court process, for example, their psychological impairment might be so that they cannot comprehend the information which is presented to them, or alternatively, P might have a speech impairment or other diagnosis, such as ‘nonspeaking Autism’, which renders them unable to effectively communicate their wishes and feelings, if at all.

Whilst the extent to which P’s true wishes and feelings can be attained will vary on a case-by-case basis, often depending on the nature and degree of P’s impairment(s), as well as other factors such as their communicative abilities, Section 4(4) of the MCA emphasises the importance of sufficient steps being taken to support and encourage P’s participation. Specifically, Section 4(4) states:

“He must, so far as reasonably practicable, permit and encourage the person [P] to participate, or to improve his ability to participate, as fully as possible in any act done for him and any decision affecting him.” In essence, the MCA requires that sufficient efforts are made to support P’s participation in the court process. Whilst there is no exhaustive list, this could include consideration of P’s communicative abilities and the ways in which they may be enhanced, for example, by referring them to ‘Speech and Language Therapy’ or implementing communication aids. Such aids may be used when obtaining P’s wishes and feelings should such an exercise be deemed necessary in a particular set of proceedings.

https://www.welfordsolicitors.co.uk/profiles/amanpreet-benning
https://www.welfordsolicitors.co.uk/profiles/brittany-gales

Capacity & Court of Protection

Posted on by admin

Mental capacity is the ability to make a decision (Code of Practice para 4.1), and is time and decision/ issue specific. A fundamental aspect for Court of Protection to have jurisdiction, is that the person must be deemed to lack capacity to make the relevant decision. There are five key principles that form the basis of the Act. The first principle is the presumption of capacity. This means P is assumed to have capacity unless it is established that he/she does not (s.1(2) Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA)). In identifying whether the individual does lack capacity, there is a two stage test as set out in the MCA at s2(1) and s3(1).

Section 2(1)

“For the purposes of this Act, a person lacks capacity in relation to a matter if at the material time he is unable to make a decision for himself in relation to the matter because of an impairment of, or a disturbance in the functioning of, the mind or brain.”

Section 3(1)

“For the purposes of section 2, a person is unable to make a decision for himself if he is unable—

(a)to understand the information relevant to the decision,

(b)to retain that information,

(c)to use or weigh that information as part of the process of making the decision, or

(d)to communicate his decision (whether by talking, using sign language or any other means).”

The above tests, are often referred to as the Diagnostic Test, and the Functional Test:

1. Diagnostic Test (Is there an impairment of or disturbance in the functioning of the mind or brain).

2. Functional test (Does the impairment mean that the person is unable to make a specific decision when they need to).

Only when you can reasonably say that the person cannot make the decision because of the impairment or disturbance of their mind or brain, can you say that they lack capacity to make the decision. This is called the “causative nexus” which is an  essential part of any mental capacity assessment and was established in the case of PC and NC v City of York Council [2013] EWCA Civ 478.

Capacity is domain specific and a person deemed to lack capacity in one domain does not mean that they lack capacity in another domain. Some common domains in the Court of Protection include whether a person has capacity to make decisions in relation to:

  • Conducting proceedings.
  • Residence.
  • Care and treatment.
  • Contact.
  • Sexual relations, marriage, contraception, reproduction etc.
  • Medical treatment.
  • Social media usage.
  • Alcohol consumption.
  • Hoarding.

These domains will be discussed separately throughout different articles.

https://www.welfordsolicitors.co.uk/profiles/jamahl-peterkin
https://www.welfordsolicitors.co.uk/profiles/janet-hall
https://www.welfordsolicitors.co.uk/profiles/divya-odedra

The Court of Protection – A Brief Overview

Posted on by admin

What is the Court of Protection?

The Court of Protection (COP) is a court in England and Wales that can make certain decisions on behalf of those who are deemed to lack capacity to make those decisions for themselves. It can also determine whether someone has or lacks the capacity to make a decision if there is a dispute.

The Court of Protection was established by the Mental Capacity Act 2005, and it is this act that provides the legislation that governs the Court of Protection. There are also other rules and practice directions that practitioners must comply with.  The court is also required to make decisions that impact people’s human rights under the Human Rights Act 1998.

The Court of Protection has jurisdiction to make decisions about Property and Affairs and Personal Health and Welfare, but only for those who are assessed as lacking the capacity to make the relevant decision for themselves.

What can the Court of Protection do?

The Court of Protection can decide whether or not a person is able to make their own decision or decisions about particular aspects of their life. If the court is satisfied that the person is not able to make their own decision, then the court can make this decision on their behalf. These decisions are often referred to as Best Interest decisions, as any decision made by the court, must be made in the persons best interests.

Not every decisions that needs to be made on behalf of someone who lacks capacity needs to be made by the Court of Protection, only certain decisions or when there is a dispute between professionals or family as to what is in the persons best interests.

The person who lacks capacity is known as ‘P’ throughout the Court of Protection proceedings. Although these proceedings are largely open to the public, there are strict rules about reporting and what can/cannot be said due to the sensitive nature of the proceeding.

When there is reasonable belief that P lacks capacity to conduct proceedings themselves, the court will appoint a litigation friend or an Accredited Legal Representative to act on their behalf so that they are properly represented in the proceedings and that their wishes and feelings are known to the court.  

How can we assist?

At Thaliwal & Veja Solicitors, we have an experienced team who represent P, their family members and PPR’s in Health & Welfare proceedings in the Court of Protection. We are contracted by the Legal Aid Agency to provide our services with the benefit of legal aid for those that are eligible.

https://www.welfordsolicitors.co.uk/profiles/poonam-virdee/